CD LAW

Custodio & Dubey LLP — Editorial Staging

Back to Index
MEDIA APPEARANCES · UNIVISION

Miguel Custodio Explains Federal Jurisdiction After Alleged Homicide Aboard MSC Cruise Ship

A cruise vacation was abruptly interrupted after a reported death aboard an MSC cruise ship prompted authorities to direct the vessel back to Galveston, Texas.

As Univision reported on the developing investigation, CD LAW attorney Miguel Custodio provided legal context about why federal authorities may become involved in serious incidents aboard cruise ships and why preserving evidence can be critical when an investigation begins at sea.

Miguel Custodio appeared as a legal commentator. CD LAW is not identified in this report as representing any party involved in the underlying incident.

Illustrative port image only. This is not the actual ship or incident.
THE INCIDENT

Why Did the Cruise Ship Return to Galveston?

According to Univision, authorities directed the MSC vessel back to the Port of Galveston after an incident involving a passenger was reported aboard the ship.

The report described the incident as an alleged homicide and said federal authorities became involved in the investigation. These are descriptions of reported allegations, not findings of guilt.

MSC told Univision it was cooperating with authorities and supporting people affected by the incident.

FEDERAL JURISDICTION

Why Can the FBI Investigate a Crime Aboard a Cruise Ship?

Cruise ship incidents can raise jurisdictional questions because a vessel may travel between U.S. and international waters and may involve people and ships connected to different countries.
In the Univision interview, Miguel Custodio explained that federal law may be relevant depending on vessel registration, where the incident occurred, the citizenship of the people involved, the vessel’s connection to the United States and other facts.
AT SEA

Does Being in International Waters Mean U.S. Law Cannot Apply?

Not necessarily.

A ship’s location, including a location in international waters, does not automatically preclude U.S. jurisdiction. The relevant factors can vary with the vessel, the people involved, where conduct occurred and other jurisdictional connections.

Miguel’s commentary for Univision addressed why the FBI could potentially have authority to investigate an incident aboard a cruise ship. The specific analysis depends on the facts.

THE FIRST HOURS MATTER

What Should Cruise Ship Security Do After a Serious Incident?

Ship security may matter early, before the appropriate authorities take control. These are general evidence-preservation considerations, not a substitute for law-enforcement direction or investigation.
  1. 01

    PRESERVE THE SCENE

    Avoid unnecessary disturbance of areas or objects that may contain relevant evidence.

  2. 02

    IDENTIFY EVIDENCE

    Preserve available physical, digital and documentary evidence.

  3. 03

    IDENTIFY WITNESSES

    Determine which passengers or crew members may have seen or heard something relevant.

  4. 04

    DOCUMENT INFORMATION

    Record names, locations, timelines and other facts while information is still fresh.

  5. 05

    COOPERATE WITH AUTHORITIES

    Provide preserved information to the appropriate investigative agencies.

EVIDENCE AT SEA

What Evidence May Matter After an Incident Aboard a Cruise Ship?

Potentially relevant information may include surveillance video; key-card or access records; passenger and crew information; witness statements; cellphone photos or video; security logs; incident reports; physical evidence; onboard medical information where legally available; and location and timeline information.
Modern cruise ships can generate significant electronic and operational information. Relevant records, when available and lawfully preserved, may help investigators reconstruct events. Not every ship maintains every type of record, and what matters depends on the circumstances.
Surveillance videoAccess recordsWitness accountsCellphone mediaSecurity logsIncident reportsPhysical evidenceMedical informationLocation and timeline
MULTIPLE AGENCIES

Why Can Cruise Ship Investigations Involve Several Authorities?

A serious incident may involve more than one authority depending on the route, location, return port and other facts. Agency involvement and investigative responsibilities can vary from case to case.

According to the Univision report, the FBI took responsibility for the investigation, and local Galveston authorities were involved in handling the detained suspect.

TRAVEL INSURANCE

Why Did the Univision Report Also Discuss Travel Insurance?

The Univision report also highlighted travel insurance in the context of unexpected medical, transportation or other emergency expenses during a trip.
Depending on the policy, potential benefits may include:
  • Emergency medical treatment
  • Hospitalization
  • Medical transportation
  • Trip interruption
  • Certain emergency travel expenses
  • Repatriation after death
  • Terms, exclusions and eligibility vary by policy; this is not a recommendation or a guarantee of coverage.
    LEGAL CONTEXT

    Why Jurisdiction Matters After a Serious Incident at Sea

    Jurisdiction refers here to the authority to investigate and potentially prosecute an alleged crime. At sea, a vessel may be registered in one jurisdiction, depart from another, travel through international waters, carry people from multiple countries and return to a U.S. port.

    That mix of connections can help explain why federal law or agencies may be involved in a serious incident. Whether they have authority depends on the applicable law and the specific facts; no single outcome applies to every cruise ship incident.

    MIGUEL CUSTODIO · CD LAW

    Legal Commentary for Univision

    Miguel Custodio provided legal commentary to help viewers understand why federal jurisdiction may apply to serious incidents aboard cruise ships and why early evidence preservation can matter.

    His appearance was commentary for a news report. It does not indicate that he participated in the investigation or that CD LAW represents anyone involved in the reported incident.

    ABOUT THIS MEDIA APPEARANCE

    An Important Distinction

    Miguel Custodio and CD LAW are presented solely in connection with Miguel’s legal commentary for the Univision report. This page does not mean CD LAW represents the cruise line, the victim, the accused individual or anyone else connected to the reported incident.

    CD LAW · LOS ANGELES

    Learn More About CD LAW

    Explore CD LAW's practice areas, legal resources and media appearances.

    EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER

    This page summarizes a third-party news report and Miguel Custodio's legal commentary for informational purposes. CD LAW does not represent any party in the reported cruise ship incident unless expressly stated otherwise. Allegations discussed in news coverage are not findings of guilt, and criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty according to law.